Did Jesus Exist? cover art

Did Jesus Exist?

The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth

 Preview
Try Premium Plus free
Pick 1 audiobook a month from our unmatched collection - including bestsellers and new releases.
Listen all you want to thousands of included audiobooks, Originals, celeb exclusives, and podcasts.
Access exclusive sales and deals.
£8.99/month after 30 days. Renews automatically. See here for eligibility.

Did Jesus Exist?

By: Bart D. Ehrman
Narrated by: Walter Dixon
Try Premium Plus free

£8.99/month after 30 days. Renews automatically. See here for eligibility.

Buy Now for £12.99

Buy Now for £12.99

Confirm Purchase
Pay using card ending in
Switch payment method
By completing your purchase, you agree to Audible's Conditions of Use and authorise Audible to charge your designated card or any other card on file. Please see our Privacy Notice, Cookies Notice and Interest-based Ads Notice.
Cancel

About this listen

Large numbers of atheists, humanists, and conspiracy theorists are raising one of the most pressing questions in the history of religion: "Did Jesus exist at all?" Was he invented out of whole cloth for nefarious purposes by those seeking to control the masses? Or was Jesus such a shadowy figure - far removed from any credible historical evidence - that he bears no meaningful resemblance to the person described in the Bible?

In Did Jesus Exist? historian and Bible expert Bart Ehrman confronts these questions, vigorously defends the historicity of Jesus, and provides a compelling portrait of the man from Nazareth. The Jesus you discover here may not be the Jesus you had hoped to meet - but he did exist, whether we like it or not.

©2012 Bart D. Ehrman (P)2012 HarperCollins Publishers Christian Living Christianity

Listeners also enjoyed...

 Forged cover art
Lost Christianities cover art
How Jesus Became God cover art
Jesus, Interrupted cover art
Jesus cover art
The Lost Gospel of Judas Iscariot cover art
Lost Scriptures cover art
The New Testament cover art
Journeys to Heaven and Hell cover art
Jesus Before the Gospels cover art
Jesus on Trial cover art
God's Problem cover art
Truth and Fiction in The Da Vinci Code cover art
Christianity cover art
On the Historicity of Jesus cover art
Searching for Jesus cover art
All stars
Most relevant  
A very detailed highly compelling thesis into the real Jesus. In my opinion it is very hard to refute much of what this book argues: that a Jewish peasant from Galilee walked the land of Palestine and died on the cross. No resurrection, no virgin birth, just a man with a particular apoplectic view. Highly recommended.

Very compelling

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Wow!
A truly outstanding book of immense importance.
Just goes to show you how blind people are to the true facts of religion.
I would love him to do one on the evil of Islam!

If only all Christians like myself listened to this book!

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
An excellent book . Well argued and convincing covering enough ground but not too much.

Did Jesus exist

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Nothing more annoying than having references and page numbers quoted in every other sentence, leave them for the back of the book.

References

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

Would you listen to Did Jesus Exist? again? Why?

Yes. I think you need to listen to this book several times in order to analyse the arguments and evidence. For me its not a book you read just once

What was one of the most memorable moments of Did Jesus Exist??

Not applicable

Which scene did you most enjoy?

Not Applicable

Was there a moment in the book that particularly moved you?

Not Applicable

Any additional comments?

I like and enjoy all Bart Ehrman's books. In my opinion he is an excellent scholar and teacher. In this book he sets down his case for a historical Jesus. Although his arguments are rational and reasoned there is an immense amount of speculation. In addition many of the arguments he gave were counter productive to the view of a historical Jesus. I feel in summary that the evidence he gives is tenuous at best. For instance he will say that the Gospels are corrupted sources that cannot be trusted but then turn to them to to show "evidence" for the historical Jesus. His use of speculative works like Q, M and L are relied on far too heavily. No modern scholar has ever seen theses books so how can see cite with any authority what is in them?

Before reading this book I was an agnostic with regards to the "Mythicist" argument and a believer in a minimalist historical Jesus. However after Bart's book I am now an agnostic (70:30 that he is a fictional figure) when it comes to the historicity of Jesus. In my opinion, from the arguments given, all that is left of a historically possible Jesus is that "there was a Jewish preacher called Jesus (or a derivative of that name) who was crucified" which could be paraphrased as "there is an English boy called Harry Potter". The picture given of Jesus is so far from the traditional view as to be meaningless for comparing that person to the one in the New Testament. Just because there is a boy called Harry Potter living in England would have no bearing on the historicity of J K Rowling's character. Nor would it be worthwhile using the Harry Potter books to find the real Harry Potter. In my opinion the New Testament is equitable to just such a fictional work. I think if the evidence for Jesus was applied to any other character in history than there would be no debate and most scholars would think he was just a legend. Whilst in my opinion this is the weakest of Bart's books it is well worth a listen if you are interested in Christianity and religion.

Good book but poor evidence

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
This is an excellent book. The author's analysis of a complex and controversial subject is clear and well balanced. He presents and objectively weighs the available historical evidence for the existence of Jesus, and concludes - convincingly in my opinion - that such a person really did exist in the early part of the first century CE.

As a former student of history at university, I particularly liked the part of the book where he set out and explained the investigative methods historians of ancient history use. It was a very easily understandable summary and may be a help to anyone starting to study historical source material. It was also useful to see those methods applied to the case in point.

I would certainly recommend what I found to be a thought provoking and easy to listen to book to anyone interested in the biography of Jesus or the study of history more generally.

5 stars.

Graham

Excellent historical scholarship

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Bart Ehrman is an excellent all-round 'objective' scholar of Judeo-Christian historicak development and resultant ideology. However, in this book he makes a methodological mistake that borders upon the usual level of anti-intellectualism that emanates from within the US, and which masquerades as 'academic vigour.' The tragedy here, is that I know he is far from stupid despite being an American! To put it simply, his expressed 'personal belief' in the physical existence of a historical Jesus is NOT academic grounds to assume that a man called 'Yeshua Ben Yoseph' (Jesus Christ) - a) physically existed, and b) on the strength of 'a' was the Son of God! This is academic nonsense. I am sure that he knows full well, that if any other figure in history possessed so little substantive supporting evidence, academia would quite rightly assume that a mythology was in operation, and any claims to literal existence would be deemed 'unsafe'. Furthermore, Ehrman, despite his own claim of being a supposed 'elite' scholar does make mistakes which I assume are due to wishful thinking on his part. In one of his other books, he claims the P52 fragment of John's Gospel (on display in the UK), dates from around 125 CE - thus proving the antiquity of John - when in fact the latest scholarship suggests a date of around 170 CE (plus or minus 20 years) and as late as 200 CE! Furthermore, Ehrman ignores the work of Karl Kausky who claimed that Early Christianity was influenced by the philosophy of the older Indian Buddhism. He also excludes Karl Marx who dismisses modern Christianity as it supports the capitalist system and is premised upon an inverted mindset (whereby thoughts in the mind are mistaken for concrete objects in the physical environment). The USSR - like the US - separated Church from State and the classroom from the Church. Socialist Law guarantees all citizens the right to follow any religion (or none), with all religious beliefs being a private matter. There was no 'official' view of Christianity in hhe USSR as incorrectly suggested by Ehrman. He thinks this because the US propagated continuous disinformation about the USSR, one lie of which involved the false propaganda that religion was surpressed. Today, this lie is aimed at Communist China and Cuba, etc, despite millions of people happily following their religions with no State interference whatsoever. The truth is that there is no physical evidence that Jesus existed.

Odd Methodology

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
The main evidence offered for the historicity of Jesus was that it is what scholars think and so we should be happy with that. One loses respect for author of books which I have previously enjoyed, when they have a generous idea of what constitutes independent testament and try to defend the testamonium flavianum as true.

Annoying

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.