
Heavens on Earth
The Scientific Search for the Afterlife, Immortality, and Utopia
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Buy Now for £11.99
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Dr. Michael Shermer
-
David Smalley
About this listen
In his most ambitious work yet, Shermer sets out to discover what drives humans' belief in life after death, focusing on recent scientific attempts to achieve immortality by radical life extentionists, extropians, transhumanists, cryonicists, and mind uploaders, along with utopians who have attempted to create heaven on earth.
For millennia, religions have concocted numerous manifestations of heaven and the afterlife, the place where souls go after the death of the physical body. Religious leaders have toiled to make sense of this place that a surprising 74 percent of Americans believe exists but from which no one has ever returned to report what it is really like.
Heavens on Earth concludes with an uplifting paean to purpose and progress and what we can do in the here and now, whether or not there is a hereafter.
©2018 Dr. Michael Shermer (P)2018 Dr. Michael Shermermade me wonder if consciousness starts at the level of cell reproduction at one point but full of a variety of perspectives and approaches to life.
insightful
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
A skeptical look at the afterlife and utopia
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Would you try another book written by Michael Shermer or narrated by Michael Shermer and David Smalley ?
No. The style of the book was a research paper for a statistical quarterly, utterly boring, the narration was very monotonic.What was most disappointing about Michael Shermer’s story?
I bought this on the basis of a review on Amazon, the premise sounded very interesting. However the content is presented in what is very often an extremely convoluted style, making it hard to follow. Also I found the chapter on the final statements of executed Texas inmates to be extremely distateful. The suggestion that these comments, made in a position of extreme duress, were a valid tool for analysis of their attitude to death is ridiculous. I felt sick after listening to this chapter.Boring and distasteful
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.