Classic SF

I first read this about 50 years ago so could not remember much of plot but turned back to it , for the comfort of being told a story in this very uncomfortable time . It was really good . Well read and a good story , Clark can be a bit cluncky with info dumps and some characters are some times one dimensional at this early stage of his career but that is mostly avoided. Some of the tech is of course wildly dated ( as is the social behaviour- characters reach for a cigarette at times of crisis for example) but the story of the struggle to survive and succeed on Mars is gripping and well narrated . The subplots all stand up well . This is classic SF and very enjoyable , the capacity for human beings to overcome problems with science is very relevant to 2021 and Clark’s belief on humanity is bracing ( as in show some backbone ) .

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

wonderful

A great story with wonderful characters and an interesting twist. Which was read beautifully

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Great readers voice Not as good as his other works

Story is not as good as his other works a bit dull less intriguing, voice actor is perfect for the story very easy to listen to.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

3 people found this helpful

Dated but enjoyable

Would you consider the audio edition of The Sands of Mars to be better than the print version?

No

What was one of the most memorable moments of The Sands of Mars?

The discussion between the main character Martin Gibson (a Science Fiction writer) and a space liner crew member about how science fiction can become dated. This seems like an aside to the reader as the author will have known how true this is.

Any additional comments?

This was written in 1951 and is set in a future time (Wikipedia reckons it is set in the 1990s) so you need to read it with that in mind - there are few computers, and no hand held computers, they valves in the radio sets and people still using typewriters in a time where there are nuclear rockets and colonies on Mars and the Moon.

It is a simple story but one I have always enjoyed reading, I enjoyed listening to it also.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

3 people found this helpful

cracking yarn !

while time has proven some of the science inaucrate, the basic story remains an excellent example of its time. Nuts and bolts sci fi of the highest calibre.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

2 people found this helpful

poor narrator.

seem like narrator found paragraphs and punctuation optional.
several times there was no break between character change or from one paragraph to another.
made it difficult to get into storyline.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

was expecting a bit more

good story but lost at the end woukd have like a bit of adventure rather then just a story about a reporter going to mars lwts have aliens and combat

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Terribly Dated

Having read the Rama series from Arthur C Clarke and enjoyed them, I was alerted by Audible that the "Sands of Mars" was now available and so I took a punt on it as I like science fiction stories that focus on Mars.

On the rare occasion that I return a book, I have managed to get through the entire thing hoping it would improve but in the case of this book I am rather sad to say that I gave up somewhere in chapter 3 I think. I really wanted to get to the part of the book that dealt with the actual experience of living on Mars but I could no longer stand the terribly dated style and references in this story. It's not so much a criticism per sae of Clarke's work because no author can predict future events and technologies to any real degree of accuracy but given the copyright date of this title as being 1951, a date before man had even set foot on the Moon, the era in which this was penned and the jarring contrasts of technologies just makes this book hard to enjoy.

The nail in the coffin was the narration. Greg Wagland has a good voice and rather sounds like the narrator of some Discovery channel documentaries I've seen but he delivers the story in a tone rather like that of a documentary and has the rather annoying trait of placing slight but noticeable gaps between words that have no punctuation as if coming to the end of a printed line and having to pause as he starts the reading on from the next line. This has the effect of breaking sentences and giving the prose and uneven flow. I spotted early on a glaring error when he said the word "Occulted" rather than the obvious correct word which would have been "Occluded". It was clear to me based on context and common sense that the word was wrong and yet narrator nor production crew picked up on this and this has been a bit of a bug bear of mine with many audio books which seem to leave the narrator to his own devices and only fix things like leaving sentences out.

The documentary style delivery is not helped by the similarly documentary style of writing this book seems to exhibit. I'm guessing this is one of Clarke's earlier works and that he hasn't yet honed his writing skills. Either that or the style is of its time and only adds to the dated feel of this story. I knew things were bad when one character offered another a cigarette in the space craft and the fact that in over an hour of listening I hadn't recalled the term computer mentioned. Instead, we hear of an "electronic calculating machine" along with type writers and fax machines. Now, again, I know that in 1951 it is difficult to envisage where technology will be more than 50 years in the future from the authors point of view but there is a terribly lop-sided vision of the future that sees man able to make use of nuclear powered space vehicles to journey to Mars and other planets within our Solar System and yet we have characters still using a type writer. The odd juxtaposition is difficult to ignore and Clarke has made the classic error of applying current technology to a world half a century into the future which is strange as Clarke has been one of those writers to have accurately predicted several of the key innovations over the decades. The much safer bet for any science fiction author is to either avoid being specific about anything other than the most exotic of technologies or if you want to mention things like type writers or electronic calculating machines then use very generic terms like composing an article or information system. The other element that further dates this story is the characters and the use of language. The captain of the Aries is the stereotypical English upper crust gentlemen with his clipped accent and the crew even have a cabin boy which is just like something from the 1930's and just seems ridiculous. I stuck this out until chapter 3 without any sign of Mars as the pacing was so slow. perhaps this is the sign of the times we live in where we find it hard to plod along at the pace set in this book and to be fair,I'm sure that in its time this story was exciting but to me it's age and narration make it ponderous and just plain old fashioned.

It is clear that Clarke at the time did his best to come up with something that would appeal and enthral readers in the 50's at the notion of "Atomic" powered space craft flown by the archetypal English gent but I'm sad to say that it just doesn't work on any level.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

4 people found this helpful